Say no to disguised massive sprawl "Blue Ribbon Projects"

Recipients

  • Senator Kristen Aston Arrington
  • Senator Bryan Avila
  • Representative Yvette Benarroch
  • Senator Mack Bernard
  • Representative Erika Booth
  • Representative David Borrero
  • Senator Lavon Bracy Davis
  • Representative Robert Charles "Chuck" Brannan III
  • Representative James Buchanan
  • Representative Kevin Chambliss
  • Representative Kimberly Daniels
  • Senator Nick DiCeglie
  • Representative Wyman Duggan
  • Representative Tiffany Esposito
  • Representative Gallop Franklin II
  • Representative Mike Giallombardo
  • Representative Peggy Gossett-Seidman
  • Senator Erin Grall
  • Representative Christine Hunschofsky
  • Representative Chip LaMarca
  • Senator Tom Leek
  • Representative Randy Maggard
  • Senator Jonathan Martin
  • Senator Debbie Mayfield
  • Senator Stan McClain
  • Representative Vanessa Oliver
  • Senator Tina Scott Polsky
  • Representative Juan Carlos Porras
  • Representative Michele Rayner
  • Representative Felicia Simone Robinson
  • Representative Michelle Salzman
  • Representative Jason Shoaf
  • Representative Tyler Sirois
  • Representative David Smith
  • Representative Carlos Guillermo Smith
  • Representative Leonard Spencer
  • Representative Chase Tramont
  • Senator Keith Truenow
  • Senator Tom Wright
  • Representative Bradford Troy "Brad" Yeager

Contact

*Required fields
 

Message

I urge you to vote NO on HB 299/SB 354, the "Blue Ribbon Projects" bill.

To [Decision Maker],

I am writing to urge you to vote NO on HB 299/SB 354, the "Blue Ribbon Projects" bill.

This bill undermines local planning, inducing sprawling development, and creates long-term risks for water resources and infrastructure. This bill also jeopardizes agricultural and rural lands by opening them up to unplanned, sprawl development. Finally, this bill targets the local planning process, which is set up to allow for measured, reasonable, and thoughtful decisions. Large-scale development proposals should not move forward without meaningful local review, comprehensive planning, and public participation.

Sector planning is better suited for large-scale development and already exists. It makes more sense if there is truly a need to create a planning process for 10,000-acre projects, to update the Sector planning process to allow projects of 10,000 acres (versus the current 15,000-acre threshold) to qualify, rather than create a new, destructive, and entirely unnecessary approval path that cuts out elected officials and public participation.

Please vote NO on HB 299/SB 354 when it comes before you for a vote.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State ZIP]
[Your Email]